Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition
1.962 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +355%
8.94 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
61.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
1.962 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
122.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
AD107
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net