Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +2476%
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2009
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GT216
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N10P-GS
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy