Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +281%
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2019
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1519 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
256
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GP108
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy