AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+21%
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
