Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Boost Clock940MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +314%
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2014
Crystal System
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Topaz
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy