Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Intel Arc A380M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Intel Arc A380M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
Arc A380M +10%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Crystal System
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1550 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
DG2-128
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy