Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +1839%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
2048
Shading Units
64
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
G94
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy