Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
1936 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +1108%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
112
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
308.0 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
G92
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N10E-GT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy