Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +7059%
3.723 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition
0.052 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Crystal System
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.600 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.00 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
M74
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
M74-M (216RMAKA12FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy