Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +9446%
3.723 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2010
Crystal System
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GT218
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
11W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy