Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X +79%
2.961 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
12
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Emerald
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy