Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1468MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X
2.961 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +306%
12.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2019
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1250 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
64
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.95 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
375.8 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.05 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.03 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
751.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Vega 10
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy