Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Arc A350

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +166%
8.192 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
DG2-128
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy