CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Arc A750
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Arc A750
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+109%
17.2 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 Nano
4677
Arc A750
+166%
12453
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R9 Nano
2191
Arc A750
+175%
6033
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
Radeon R9 Nano
28
Arc A750
+42%
40
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
Radeon R9 Nano
60
Arc A750
+25%
75
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
Radeon R9 Nano
75
Arc A750
+33%
100
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
VS
Intel Arc A750
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
DG2-512
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA T1000
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Related News
1
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
2
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
3
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
4
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
5
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
6
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
7
Intel Unveils Three New Xeon 6 Processors
8
AMD Officially Launches the Zen5 Series Threadripper
9
GIGABYTE Launches AI TOP ATOM Desktop Supercomputer Delivering 1000 TOPS Performance
10
Intel Official Website Unveils Arc B750 Graphics Card
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy