Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +56%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
44
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Hawaii
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy