Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +3492%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
320MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
143W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G80
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy