Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3376 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (86W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +712%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5750
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
9
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
720
256
TMUs
36
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
86W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Juniper
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy