Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +8345%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220 OEM
0.097 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.048 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.096 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
97.15 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
58W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT215
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy