AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Lower TDP (175W vs 320W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock2550MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +537%

52.22 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +515%

28371

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +392%

138

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano

60

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +323%

254

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +300%

300

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Jan 2024

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2295 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2550 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1438 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6X

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

736.3GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

80

4096

Shading Units

10240

256

TMUs

320

64

ROPs

112

-

Tensor Cores

320

-

RT Cores

80

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

64 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

285.6 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

816.0 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

52.22 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.22 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

816.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W

TDP

320W

450 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

AD103

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

AD103-400-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

45.9 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.3

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon 540

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8740 OEM

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

6

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Arc A310

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA PG506 232

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition

Related News

1

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

2

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

3

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

4

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

5

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

6

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

7

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

8

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

9

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

10

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!