Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 21.34GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +2534%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
0.311 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
21.34GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.240 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
311.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GF108
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy