CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 265
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+332%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
Radeon R7 265
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 1440SP Edition
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy