Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +332%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy