AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 610 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+5151%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 610
0.156 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 Nano
+5338%
4677
GeForce GT 610
86
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R9 Nano
+6746%
2191
GeForce GT 610
32
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
29W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GF119
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
