Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 175W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV380
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy