Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1873%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
144
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GF116
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy