Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1263%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GF116
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy