Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (170W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +548%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
1.263 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.17 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.67 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1263 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
170W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GF114
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy