AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 409.6GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (175W vs 210W)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Boost Clock1471MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

Radeon RX Vega 56 +28%

10.54 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

Radeon RX Vega 56 +49%

6873

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

Radeon RX Vega 56 +7%

30

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano +5%

60

Radeon RX Vega 56

57

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

Radeon RX Vega 56 +16%

87

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

Radeon RX Vega 56

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Aug 2017

Pirate Islands

Generation

Vega

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1156 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1471 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

800 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM

Memory Type

HBM2

4096bit

Memory Bus

2048bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

409.6GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

64

Compute Units

56

4096

Shading Units

3584

256

TMUs

224

64

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

2 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

94.14 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

329.5 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.09 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.54 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

659.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

Vega 10

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)

GCN 3.0

Architecture

GCN 5.0

TSMC

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

28 nm

Process Size

14 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

12.5 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

495 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

210W

450 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.2

Vulkan

1.2

-

CUDA

-

6.3

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

5

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

7

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 250

Related News

1

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

2

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

3

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

4

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

5

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

6

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

7

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

8

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

9

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products

10

NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs