Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +202%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4010
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2024
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GA107
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy