Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2000
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
230 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.360GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
NV15
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GeForce2 Ultra
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Celsius
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.025 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
88 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
7.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.5
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy