AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+300%
8.192 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
596 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
