CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 240W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+1621%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
175W
TDP
240W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
R600
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy