Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +76%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Navi 14
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy