AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 7700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)

640 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (175W vs 245W)

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 's Advantages

Released 8 years late

Boost Clock2544MHz

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 7700 XT +329%

35.17 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

Radeon RX 7700 XT +269%

17023

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

Radeon RX 7700 XT +128%

64

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano

60

Radeon RX 7700 XT +113%

128

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

Radeon RX 7700 XT +190%

218

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

Radeon RX 7700 XT

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Aug 2023

Pirate Islands

Generation

Navi III

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1435 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2544 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

192bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

432.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

64

Compute Units

54

4096

Shading Units

3456

256

TMUs

216

64

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

54

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

2 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

244.2 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

549.5 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

70.34 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

35.17 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

1099 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

Navi 32

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

Navi 32 XL (215-180000076)

GCN 3.0

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

28.1 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

346 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

245W

450 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

2.2

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

-

6.3

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

3

AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

4

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

6

AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3570

Related News

1

Complete Layout of Intel's Next-Gen LGA1851 Interface Exposed: A Comprehensive Look at PCIe and USB Features

2

Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'

3

Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM

4

Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan

5

The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation

6

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

7

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

8

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

9

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

10

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory