Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1617%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT200
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy