Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM T1000 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +227%
8.192 TFLOPS
T1000 8 GB
2.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
TU117
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy