AMD Radeon RX 460 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460
+6618%
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2009
Arctic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Baffin
GPU Name
RV620
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
