Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon RX 5300 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1368 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300 +14375%
4.632 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Navi
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1327 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
40
88
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
144.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
9.265 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
289.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
RV620
Navi 14 XE
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy