Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Jan 2007
Navi
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1670 MHz
Base Clock
-
1845 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
22
Compute Units
-
1408
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

59.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
162.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
10.39 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
324.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
RV516
Navi 14 XL
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy