Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 550 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 550 's Advantages
Boost Clock1183MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 550
1.211 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +372%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2017
Polaris
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
-
1183 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
37.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
1211 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
1211 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
75.71 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy