Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5500 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (1845MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5500 XT +445%
5.196 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2019
Release Date
Dec 2013
Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1845 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
162.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
10.39 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
324.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 14 XTX (215-0932396)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy