Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1410MHz vs 1226MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560 XT
4.394 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +187%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Sep 2021
Polaris
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1074 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1226 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
4480
112
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

39.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
137.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
4.394 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
4.394 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
274.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA100
Polaris 10 LE1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy