Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560X vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon RX 560X vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560X and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2018
Release Date
Jan 2007
Polaris
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1175 MHz
Base Clock
-
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

20.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
81.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
2.611 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.611 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
163.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
RV516
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy