Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1420MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 GME +948%
6.543 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2020
Release Date
Feb 2012
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1257 MHz
Base Clock
-
1420 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
6
2304
Shading Units
480
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

45.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
204.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
6.543 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.543 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
409.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Turks
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy