Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (1545MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 +1536%
7.119 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2014
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
5
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

49.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
7.119 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
445.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 30
GPU Name
Oland
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
26W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy