Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (1545MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 +1326%
7.119 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Oct 2013
Polaris
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
7.119 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
445.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 30
GPU Name
Oland
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy