Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2040MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (32W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +142%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
Navi II
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
12
RT Cores
36
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x HDMI 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
TU106
Navi 24 XL
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy