AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

VS

AMD Radeon RX 6400 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages

Released 7 years late

Boost Clock has increased by 97% (2321MHz vs 1178MHz)

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)

Lower TDP (53W vs 120W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages

256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon RX 6400 +47%

3.565 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 960

2.413 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon RX 6400 +56%

3579

GeForce GTX 960

2284

Blender

Radeon RX 6400 +69%

325

GeForce GTX 960

192

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon RX 6400

8

GeForce GTX 960 +25%

10

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon RX 6400

20

GeForce GTX 960 +25%

25

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon RX 6400

35

GeForce GTX 960

35

Radeon RX 6400

VS

GeForce GTX 960

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jan 2015

Navi II

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz

Base Clock

1127 MHz

2321 MHz

Boost Clock

1178 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1753 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

128.0GB/s

Bandwidth

112.2GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

12

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

1024

48

TMUs

64

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

12

RT Cores

-

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

37.70 GPixel/s

111.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

75.39 GTexel/s

7.130 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

3.565 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.413 TFLOPS

222.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

75.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

GM206

Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)

GPU Variant

GM206-300-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

28 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

228 mm²

Board Design

53W

TDP

120W

250 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

5.2

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

2

AMD Radeon RX 580 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

3

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs Intel Arc A310

4

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

5

AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

6

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

7

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

8

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

9

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

10

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

2

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

3

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

4

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

5

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

6

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

7

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

8

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

9

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

10

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W