Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (53W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400 +8%
3.565 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2014
Navi II
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

53W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy