Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2007
Navi II
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV530
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

53W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy