Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (2815MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (107W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6500 XT +142%
5.765 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Navi II
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2310 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2815 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2248 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.9GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

90.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
180.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
11.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
5.765 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
360.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
DG1
Navi 24 XT (215-135000006)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
107 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

107W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy